dynodoc. Open workspace Built around the research process
A questionnaire is more than a file. It carries choices about wording, context, measurement and people. Dynodoc gives those choices somewhere to live.
A fieldworker spots an ambiguous phrase. A colleague proposes a different recall period. The protocol changes after review. Dynodoc is designed to keep the document, the proposed revision and the decision connected, so the next person can understand what changed.
Import the questionnaire and its source file. Keep the original beside an editable copy, with conversion notes you can review.
Community wellbeing · Original instrument
Interactive example. Select a step to see how a revision moves through the workspace.
The FAIR framework organizes guidance around findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability. Its authors apply the principles to research workflows and tools as well as datasets. Dynodoc’s use of structured content and retained history is a design response to that need; it is not FAIR certification.
Wilkinson et al., The FAIR Guiding PrinciplesWilson and colleagues recommend practical habits for organizing data, recording changes, collaborating and preparing manuscripts. Dynodoc brings selected version-control ideas into graphical document and questionnaire editing.
Wilson et al., Good enough practices in scientific computingA 2015 project repeated 100 studies from three psychology journals. Its report found statistically significant results in 97% of the original studies and 36% of replications. This is a result for that selected study set and significance criterion, not a universal reproducibility rate. The Association for Psychological Science reported the findings for a project that included 40 studies from its journal.
APS report on the Open Science Collaboration (2015) · Original Science paper
These findings motivate transparent methods and materials. They do not measure Dynodoc’s impact, and version history alone cannot establish research validity.
Compare alternative wording. Keep questionnaire logic and translations with the instrument. Name the version your team approves.
Give colleagues a role that fits their contribution. Review proposed changes before combining them with the shared document.
Pass on the source file, working copy and revision record. Let the next researcher recover context from the work itself.
Publish a deliberate read-only copy. Export editable files for other tools. Keep private review conversations inside the workspace.